Incident brief
RESTRICT foreign-key violation
Deleting or updating a parent row referenced by a child fails when the foreign key uses RESTRICT (or NO ACTION with a still-present child); the referencing rows must go first.
In 10 seconds
- What
- RESTRICT foreign-key violation
- What triggers it
- Create a parent/child foreign key with RESTRICT and insert a referenced parent row plus a child that references it.
- The fix
- Delete or reassign the referencing child rows before deleting the parent.
- Proof
- Reproduced on PostgreSQL 18.4 → A DELETE on the parent reproduces SQLSTATE 23001; RESTRICT blocks it and the DETAIL names the referencing child key.
The fix
What to do right now
The immediate, application-level response to this error.
- Delete or reassign the referencing child rows before deleting the parent.
- Or, if cascade semantics are intended, define the foreign key ON DELETE CASCADE deliberately.
-- Remove the referencing child rows first.
DELETE FROM child_r WHERE pid = 1;
DELETE FROM parent_r WHERE id = 1;Diagnose
See it live on the server
Run these against the affected instance to confirm the diagnosis before you act.
Standard triage — not specific to this error
These are canonical PostgreSQL system-catalog queries, shown as SQL to run. No sample output is attached because this is general triage, not a captured lab transcript.This SQLSTATE does not have an error-specific live snapshot yet. These are the canonical system-catalog queries you run against the affected server to see the problem in real time — standard triage, not a reproduced transcript.
What is running right now
Active backends, how long each has been running, and what it is waiting on.
SELECT pid,
state,
wait_event_type,
wait_event,
now() - query_start AS running_for,
left(query, 80) AS query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE state <> 'idle'
AND pid <> pg_backend_pid()
ORDER BY running_for DESC NULLS LAST;Who is blocking whom
Turn raw blocking PIDs into the actual queries on both sides of the wait.
SELECT blocked.pid AS blocked_pid,
blocked.query AS blocked_query,
blocking.pid AS blocking_pid,
blocking.query AS blocking_query
FROM pg_stat_activity AS blocked
JOIN LATERAL unnest(pg_blocking_pids(blocked.pid)) AS b(pid) ON true
JOIN pg_stat_activity AS blocking ON blocking.pid = b.pid
WHERE cardinality(pg_blocking_pids(blocked.pid)) > 0;Locks that are still waiting
Every lock a backend has requested but not yet been granted.
SELECT l.pid,
l.locktype,
l.mode,
l.granted,
COALESCE(c.relname, l.transactionid::text) AS object
FROM pg_locks l
LEFT JOIN pg_class c ON c.oid = l.relation
WHERE NOT l.granted
ORDER BY l.pid;Why it happens
What PostgreSQL is telling you
The mechanism behind the error, grounded in the official manual — not paraphrased.
PostgreSQL 18 Documentation — Appendix A. PostgreSQL Error Codes (Table A.1, Class 23 — Integrity Constraint Violation)
23001 → restrict_violationRead the full section on postgresql.org →
Deleting a referenced parent under RESTRICT
The child still references the parent key, so RESTRICT raises 'update or delete on table parent_r violates RESTRICT setting of foreign key constraint child_r_pid_fkey'.The session continues normally
The failing statement ran outside a transaction block, so nothing was left in a bad state — the next statement in the same connection runs normally.Reproduce & verify
A real, single-session PostgreSQL reproduction
A literal transcript of SQL run against a live PostgreSQL instance in an isolated lab — the commands below are exactly what was executed.
- 1Create a parent/child foreign key with RESTRICT and insert a referenced parent row plus a child that references it.
- 2DELETE the parent while the child row still references it.
- 3PostgreSQL enforces RESTRICT and aborts the delete with SQLSTATE 23001.
A cleanup deleted a parent record while child rows still pointed at it, and the RESTRICT foreign key refused the delete.
CREATE TABLE parent_r(id int primary key);
CREATE TABLE child_r(id int, pid int REFERENCES parent_r(id) ON DELETE RESTRICT);
INSERT INTO parent_r VALUES (1);
INSERT INTO child_r VALUES (10, 1);DELETE FROM parent_r WHERE id = 1;SELECT 'ok' AS session_after_error;What PostgreSQL actually returned
CREATE TABLE
CREATE TABLE
INSERT 0 1
INSERT 0 1ERROR: update or delete on table "parent_r" violates RESTRICT setting of foreign key constraint "child_r_pid_fkey" on table "child_r"
DETAIL: Key (id)=(1) is referenced from table "child_r". session_after_error
---------------------
ok
(1 row)The parent deletes once its referencing children are gone.
We delete the child rows first, then delete the parent.
Without this
Before: deleting the parent is blocked
With this, tested
After: children removed, parent deletes
What Pro unlocks here
- The exact prevention SQL — copy-paste ready
- Raw psql output captured from the Docker lab
- A senior-DBA action list to take it further
- Live monitoring queries to catch it in production
- The deeper audit: fix-that-fails counterexample, GUC before/after, server-log evidence
Related & next steps
Follow the thread
Everything this error touches — jump straight to the sibling error, term, runbook, or parameter.
Verification
- Last verified
- 2026-07-24 (isolated lab, PostgreSQL 18.4)
- Reviewed by
- Verified against PostgreSQL 18.4 in an isolated lab environment
- Audit status
- reviewed